Legal Opinion

Kirkham v. Wright

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1988No. Nos. 53386, 53449PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

John and Marilyn Kirkham, husband and wife, brought a nuisance action against their next-door neighbors Kingsley 0. Wright and Joyce Wright, for damages to the Kirkhams’ premises from excessive surface water runoff allegedly resulting from the Wrights’ installation of an in-ground swimming pool. The jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the Kirk-hams in the amount of $56,600.00. The trial court granted the Wrights’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, motion for new trial and ordered a new trial. The trial court also set aside its prior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Craft v. ScamanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Kuzuf v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Lupkey v. WeldonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Estate of DucatMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Schulze v. Monsanto Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API