Ballard v. Daniel
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Morgan superior court — Judge Park. December 4, 1915.
1Opinion of the Court
Bboyles, J'.
1. Ordinarily, before a laborer’s lien can be foreclosed, it must be shown that the laborer has fully completed the contract. However, if the completion of the contract was waived or prevented by the other party thereto, this is equivalent to a completion of the same, as a remedial element. Haralson v. Speer, 1 Ga. App. 573 (58 S. E. 142); Sattes & Weimer Lumber Co. v. Hales, 11 Ga. App. 569 (75 S. E. 898).(a)' In this case it appears that the plaintiff in execution, known in bucolic vernacular as a “third patcher” (i. e. one who works a crop or “patch” for a third of the crop),…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haralson v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Sattes & Wimer Lumber Co. v. HalesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Craig v. DayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Payne v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Cluff v. Merchants & Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Cummings v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.