Legal Opinion

Trigeant Holdings, Ltd. v. Jones

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 15, 2005No. 01-04-00542-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., Justice.

We withdraw our Opinion of July 28, 2005 and issue the following Opinion in its stead. We deny the appellants’ motion for rehearing.

This is an accelerated, interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of a special appearance filed by appellants, Trigeant Holdings, Ltd. and Trigeant Holdings, LLC (collectively “the Trigeant Holdings entities”). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7) (Vernon Supp.2004-2005). The Trigeant Holdings entities argue that the trial court erred by denying their special appearance for the following…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Retamco Operating, Inc. v. Republic Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Old Republic Nat'l Title Ins. Co. v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Cappuccitti v. Gulf Industrial Products, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. Citizens National Bank of Texas v. NXS Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API