Legal Opinion

Elggren v. Woolley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1924No. 4101PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff’s hereinafter called appellants, as copartners' doing business under the name and style of Elggren Bros. & Co., brought this action against the defendant to recover the sum of $13,000 with legal interest.

In the complaint it is alleged that appellants, between the 18th day of January and the 9th day of July, 1917, had "invested in bonds of the Montana-Utah Sugar Company, a corporation, * * * in the sum of $9,500, and during the same period plaintiffs had also invested in capital stock of said sugar company in the sum of $3,500” for which stock certificates representing 165 shares…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wardell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Guernsey v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Thomas v. Brownville, Fort Kearney, & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Myers v. MeinrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. C & Y CORP. v. General Biometrics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  2. Sellers v. HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Nicholson v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Beadle v. DanielsWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Glen Allen Mining Co. v. Park Galena Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API