Legal Opinion

Duncomb v. New York, Housatonic & Northern Railroad

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, made December 13, 1881, which affirmed an order of Special Term, determining and fixing the relative rights and priorities of certain bondholders, under a mortgage made by defendant, the New York Housatonic and Northern Railroad Company to secure its bonds. This action was brought by plaintiffs, as trustees, to foreclose said mortgage.

Read the full summary

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, made December 13, 1881, which affirmed an order of Special Term, determining and fixing the relative rights and priorities of certain bondholders, under a mortgage made by defendant, the New York Housatonic and Northern Railroad Company to secure its bonds. This action was brought by plaintiffs, as trustees, to foreclose said mortgage. A referee was appointed to ascertain the amount due on account of the bonds, and the nature and extent of the interest of the bondholders. The orders of the Special…

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

When this case was presented on the former appeal to this court, we held that Eucker should be allowed to prove all of the $810,000 of bonds which he held as a pledge to secure him for a debt due him from the railroad company of $81,000 and interest, and which he could produce for that purpose, and was entitled to share in the distribution of the fund to that amount. The title of Eucker to the bonds of the railroad company has been upheld to the extent indicated in the findings of the judge at Special Term, and is now assailed on various grounds which are entitled to due consideration. Eucker…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. New Memphis Gaslight Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  2. County Court v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1888
  3. Doyle v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Cheney v. San Francisco Mines, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Farman v. Town of EllingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API