Legal Opinion

Inland Waterways Shippers Ass'n v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 1, 1960No. 57 C 136(3)Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBER, District Judge.

This cause was tried before the Court, without a jury, and at the conclusion of the trial was passed for filing of briefs *820Extension of time on the filing of briefs was granted at the request of parties and thereafter the matter was submitted and the Court now having heard the testimony and having examined the briefs of counsel, and being fully advised herein does find as follows:

Facts on Count I

In 1954 plaintiff L. F. Foster Company, hereinafter referred to as Foster, purchased 620 bundles of new galvanized 1 and 1% inch fence pipe from the Saw Hill Tube Company of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Maggie HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Railroad Co. v. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. United States of America, and Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Isaac MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. General Foods Corporation v. the TroubadorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  5. The SolveigDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API