Legal Opinion

Aetna Insurance v. Heidelberg

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the circuit court of Forest county. Hon. Paul B. Johnson,, Judge. On suggestion of error former opinion 72 So. 470.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

This case was affirmed without opinion, but in view of the earnestness and confidence with which counsel for appellant press the suggestion of error that was filed in due time, we are stating briefly the reasons that induced ns to affirm the case. The appellee in this case, a retail furniture dealer,, entered into a contract of insurance with appellant, whereby appellant insured appellee against all loss or damage by fire to an amount not exceeding two thousand four hundred dollars —-“on their interest in the household furniture of every description, useful and ornamental, while contained in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Phenix Insurance v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Ocean Insurance v. PolleysSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. Conithan v. Royal InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Georgia Cas. Co. v. Alden MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mississippi Fire Ins. Co. v. Planters' BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Geo. Benz & Sons v. HassieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Luderbach Plumbing Co. v. SteinMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Foremost Insurance v. LoweryDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API