Legal Opinion

Nessbit v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14271PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Petitioner invokes the aid of the writ of mandamus to compel the judge presiding in the department of the Superior Court of the County of Alameda in which a proceeding is pending wherein petitioner and approxi mately 100 other shareholders of the capital stock issued by the Automatic Electrical Machine Company, Inc., a foreign corporation, are joined as plaintiffs and Victory A. Derrick, C. Z. Sutton, E. Anderson, P. K. Sydes, A. T. Dowse, E. Ebeling and W. C. Hollingsworth, stockholders and members of the board of directors of said corporation, are named as defendants, to comply with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powelson v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In re FifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ex parte MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Amos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Goodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Shaw v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Rankin v. Frebank Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. In re BanschbachMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Rosenfeld v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API