Legal Opinion

Murphey v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 3, 1948No. 5809PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON, District Judge.

This action is brought by the heirs at law of Huldah Murphey to recover the pecuniary loss sustained by them resulting from her death. Section 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California gives a right of action' to the heirs at law against the tort-feasor causing the death and against the employer responsible for his conduct.

Huldah Murphey was struck by a motor vehicle owned by defendant, United States of America, and driven at the time by Paul Brander, a member of the Army Air Corps of defendant. Brander was a staff sergeant stationed at a radar…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Newman v. SteuernagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Hanchett v. WiseleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Hall v. Puente Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. EleazerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971
  3. MacKay v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1949
  4. Wibye v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1949
  5. Tucker v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API