Legal Opinion

Bradford and May-Ling Love v. State Farm Lloyds

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 12, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00651Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION BRADFORD AND MAY-LING § No. 1:24-CV-651-DAE LOVE, § § Plaintiffs, § § vs. § § STATE FARM LLOYDS, § § Defendant. § § ORDER Before the Court are Defendant State Farm Lloyds’s (“Defendant” or “State Farm”) Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Roof Coverage and Plaintiffs’ Extra-Contractual Claims. (Dkts. ## 25, 26.) Plaintiffs Bradford and May-Ling Love (“Plaintiffs”) filed two Responses in Opposition, (Dkts. ## 27, 28), and Defendant filed two Replies in Support of its motions. (Dkts. ## 29, 30.) The Court…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API