Bourget v. Government Employees Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
QUESTION PRESENTED
In this diversity action to recover the excess over the policy limits on the ground that the insurer negligently failed to settle within the policy limits, the chief question presented by plaintiff’s motion for production of documents, pursuant to Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P., and defendant’s objections to certain of plaintiff’s interrogatories, pursuant to Rule 33, Fed.R.Civ.P., assuming relevance and good cause are shown, is whether the attorney-client privilege bars plaintiff from obtaining discovery of certain documents and information relating to the prior…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Alex N. Bell v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Pete Rinaldi's Fast Foods, Inc. v. Great American Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.