Continental Casualty Co. v. Fina Oil & Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Concurrence
EVELYN V. KEYES,
Justice, concurring.
The majority holds that Fina was never an additional insured under A & B’s insurance policies. Because I believe established law requires us to find that Fina became an additional insured under on A & B’s GCL policy on August 18, 1997, when the certificate of insurance naming Fina as an additional insured was issued by Continental, four days after Wisdom’s injury, I concur in the judgment only.
I. Continental’s Appeal
The Additional Insured Endorsement provided with A & B’s Continental insurance policies states that a person or organization becomes an…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Balandran v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. George E. Gibbons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.