Legal Opinion
Kurin, Inc. v. Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 28, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01060Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KURIN, INC., Case No.: 3:18-cv-1060-L-LL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 v. SEAL 14 MAGNOLIA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kurin, Inc.’s (“Kurin”) motion to seal 20 portions of its memorandum of points and authorities and a deposition excerpt. (Doc. no. 21 97-1 (“Mot. to Seal”).) Defendant Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc. (“Magnolia”) 22 did not file an opposition. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied. 23 Sealing court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.