Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Dearing

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 18, 2006No. 05-0405/NAPublished

1DissentCrawford, Judge

I respectfully dissent because the majority continues a pattern of refusing to give deference to the President’s legislatively mandated rulemaking authority in contravention of established principles of separation of powers. See United States v. Moreno, 63 M.J. 129, 144 (C.A.A.F.2006) (Crawford, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Under Article 36, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 836 (2000), the President has the authority to prescribe “[pjretrial, trial, and post-trial procedures, including modes of proof’ unless these provisions are inconsistent with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. LopezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. MizgalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  5. United States v. KeyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API