Legal Opinion

Heller v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether the real property transfer gains tax imposed pursuant to article 31-B of the Tax Law is a transfer tax or other similar expense within the meaning of EDPL 702 (A) (1) so as to require reimbursement by the State. We hold that since the transfer gains tax does not represent an incidental expense such as a recording fee, transfer tax, or a similar expense incurred in connection with the transfer of the property, it is not a transfer tax within the meaning of EDPL 702 (A) (1), and the State is not required to reimburse…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sontag v. SontagNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Heller v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burke v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Heller v. Trustees of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In Re WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  4. S & M Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. 52nd Street Designee Corp. v. Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API