Hurth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Alonzo Hurth, the appellant, was convicted of robbery in the first degree and was sentenced as a habitual felony offender with three prior felony convictions to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
The appellant raises six issues on this direct appeal of his conviction. Because we are remanding this case to the trial court, we need address at this time only the appellant's contention that the State did not prove a prior Georgia felony conviction that was used to enhance his sentence for the purpose of applying the Habitual Felony Offender Act, because, he says, the State failed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Tidmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Summerhill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alonzo Hurth v. Billy MitchemCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Ex Parte EasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Hurth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.