Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Eason
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 18, 2005No. 1041225PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
929 So.2d 992 (2005)
Ex parte David EASON.
(In re David Eason
v.
State of Alabama).
1041225.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
November 18, 2005.
Thomas M. Goggans, Montgomery, for petitioner.
Troy King, atty. gen., and Nancy M. Kirby, deputy atty. gen., for respondent.
2Per curiam
David Eason pleaded guilty to first-degree theft of property, a violation of § 13A-8-3, Ala.Code 1975. At the time of the guilty-plea colloquy, the trial court found Eason guilty of first-degree theft, but withheld formal adjudication to allow Eason to apply for a pretrial diversion program. After Eason's application for pretrial diversion was…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Shirley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Wilkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Kelley v. State (Ex parte Kelley)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- Benn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- State v. D.L.A.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Glaze v. City of AlabasterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.