Stengle v. Office of Dispute Resolution
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge.
THE BACKGROUND OF THIS MEMORANDUM IS AS FOLLOWS:
Pending before this Court are two Motions for Summary Judgment. (Rec. Docs.88, 90). For the reasons that follow, the Motions will be granted.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
On September 27, 2006, Plaintiff Linda Stengle (“Plaintiff’ or “Stengle”) initiated the instant action by filing her first Complaint. (Rec. Doc. 1). On October 31, 2006, prior to any responsive pleadings, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (Rec. Doc. 12). On March 21, 2007, 479 F.Supp.2d 472, we issued a Memorandum and Order (Rec. Doc. 30)…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MILLER v. GOGGINDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023