Nalley v. First Nat. Bank, Medford
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
During the course of the trial, a partial transcript of testimony taken by W. J. Looker, at the instance of the attorney for Mr. Pointer, in a proceeding in the county court, was received in evidence over the objection of plaintiff and appellant. This proceeding had been instituted by defendant and appellant Anna C. Nalley for the purpose of having her father William A. Pointer declared to be an incompetent and having a guardian appointed for him. Mr. Looker, the stenographer who took the testimony, though doubtless most proficient, was not appointed by the court for that purpose and was in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Turner v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- North v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Lambert v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Sappingfield v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Halleck v. HALLECKOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Thorp v. DanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Vaughn v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Masquart v. DickOregon Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.