Legal Opinion

Heydinger v. idX, Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 29, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00015Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AUBRIE HEYDINGER, : Plaintiff, | Case No. 3:20-cv-15 | Vv. JUDGE WALTER H. RICE idX CORPORATION, Defendant. : DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT idX CORPORATION (DOC. #30); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY Following her termination, Plaintiff, Aubrie Heydinger, filed suit against her | former employer, idX Corporation,’ alleging disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation in violation of federal and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API