Legal Opinion

In Re Cyberonics Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided November 28, 2006No. Civil Action H-05-2121PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum and Order

MILLER, District Judge.

Pending before the court is Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association’s (“LACERA”) Motion to Intervene, to Compel the Cyberonics Investor Group to Publish Notice and to Stay Proceedings. Dkt. # 66. Having considered the motion, the responses, and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part.

Factual and Procedural Background

This consolidated case constitutes a putative securities fraud class action involving the stock of Defendant Cyberonics, Inc. (“Cyberonics”). The lawsuit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brunet v. United Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Nathenson v. Zonagen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Hershel Hiram McKnight v. C. H. Blanchard, Sheriff of Lubbock County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. MyMail, Ltd. v. America Online, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular De P.R.United States District Court · 2018
  2. In Re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
  3. In Re Cyberonics Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  4. In re Houston American Energy Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  5. ITO-STONE v. DBV TECHNOLOGIES S.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API