Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1938No. 6 Div. 274PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Action on the case by the appellant against appellee, for personal injury proximately resulting from being struck in her right eye by a a lollypop or “all-day sucker” consisting of a wad of candy moulded on a stick an eighth of an inch in diameter and three and a half or four inches in length, ’ weighing three-fourths-of an ounce, thrown by the defendant’s servant or agent into a crowd of women and children in carrying out defendant’s, scheme of advertising its holiday goods, wares, and merchandise.

The case was submitted to the jury under the first and third counts of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. HanbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Loreno v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Montevallo Mining Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Employers Insurance Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. RivesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. City of Birmingham v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Stevens v. Rice (In Re Rice)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1982
  4. Employers Insurance Company of Alabama v. RivesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Hardware Mutual Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. C. A. Snyder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API