Hart v. Department of Revenue
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Plaintiffs, copartners doing business as the Century Finance Company, purchased promissory notes from the holders thereof at a discount and for less than the face amounts of the principal or balances due on such notes, and when and if paid, realized a profit over and above the amounts paid for the notes. Notwithstanding their claim that they were not legally liable for an intangible tax of $2,103.21 for such discounts or profits realized from this source over a period .of 3 years, they paid additional assessments for the disputed amounts, and brought suit for the recovery of the amounts so…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In Re Dodge BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Standard Oil Co. v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Abeloff v. Ohio Finance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- Department of Treasury v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ford Motor Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wyckoff v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Detroit Bank & Trust Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.