Legal Opinion

Hart v. Department of Revenue

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. Docket 89, Calendar 45,365PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiffs, copartners doing business as the Century Finance Company, purchased promissory notes from the holders thereof at a discount and for less than the face amounts of the principal or balances due on such notes, and when and if paid, realized a profit over and above the amounts paid for the notes. Notwithstanding their claim that they were not legally liable for an intangible tax of $2,103.21 for such discounts or profits realized from this source over a period .of 3 years, they paid additional assessments for the disputed amounts, and brought suit for the recovery of the amounts so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. In Re Dodge BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Abeloff v. Ohio Finance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Department of Treasury v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Wyckoff v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Detroit Bank & Trust Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API