Legal Opinion

Howell v. Thompson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. — T. M. McConnell, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

These hills were filed hy a number of property owners, whose houses were occupied hy so-called soft drink dealers, and by the proprietors of several soft drink establishments, to enjoin Frank M. Thompson, the attorney-general of Tennessee, from proceeding against them under chapter 2 of the Acts of 1913, Second Extra Session, known as the “Nuisance Act.”

A temporary restraining order was issued by the chancellor, and after notice and hearing an interlocu*313tory injunction was issued, by which the defendant was enjoined from proceeding against complainants, or any of them under the Nuisance Act,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Conner v. HerbertTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. RagghiantiTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Troughber v. AkinTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Foley v. LeathTennessee Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Downing v. Dunlap Coal, Etc., Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Churchwell v. CallensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  5. Cockrill v. Peoples Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API