Legal Opinion

Stanley T. Johnson Constance Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 2006No. 04-72322PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.

Stanley T. Johnson and his present wife, Constance Johnson (“Appellants”), appeal from the United States Tax Court’s decision that there is a deficiency in income tax due from them for the taxable year 1997. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. The gravamen of Appellants’ argument is that Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) § 71, as amended in 1984 (“new § 71” or the “new law”), should apply to Mr. Johnson’s deduction for alimony in the 1997 tax year, rather than the version of I.R.C. § 71 that existed prior to the amendment (“old § 71” or the “old…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ramiro Cornejo-Barreto, AKA Rabbit, AKA Cornhole v. W.H. Seifert, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Marjorie Cathey Miller v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Alton F. Lounsbury and Lorraine M. Lounsbury v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Samueli v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  2. Bragg v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
  3. Henry and Susan F. Samueli v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  4. Samueli v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  5. Webb v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API