Stanley T. Johnson Constance Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.
Stanley T. Johnson and his present wife, Constance Johnson (“Appellants”), appeal from the United States Tax Court’s decision that there is a deficiency in income tax due from them for the taxable year 1997. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. The gravamen of Appellants’ argument is that Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) § 71, as amended in 1984 (“new § 71” or the “new law”), should apply to Mr. Johnson’s deduction for alimony in the 1997 tax year, rather than the version of I.R.C. § 71 that existed prior to the amendment (“old § 71” or the “old…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ramiro Cornejo-Barreto, AKA Rabbit, AKA Cornhole v. W.H. Seifert, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Marjorie Cathey Miller v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Alton F. Lounsbury and Lorraine M. Lounsbury v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Samueli v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Bragg v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- Henry and Susan F. Samueli v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Samueli v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Webb v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007