Legal Opinion

Forelaws on Board v. Energy Facility Siting Council

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1988No. SC S33953; SC S33954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

At issue is whether the Energy Facility Siting Council (EFSC) lawfully determined that certain industrial waste of intervenor Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) was not “radioactive waste,” as that term is defined by ORS 469.300(17). Petitioners contend that EFSC misinterpreted ORS 469.300(17), committed procedural errors and based its decision on insufficient evidence. We affirm EFSC’s order.

I

The disposal of radioactive waste in Oregon requires a site certificate from EFSC. See ORS 469.320(1) and ORS 469.300(10)(b), (14), (17)(a) and (24). “Radioactive waste” is defined by ORS 469.300(17)(a):

“…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Coffey v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERSOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Arlington Education Ass'n v. Arlington School District No. 3Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Martini v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API