Legal Opinion

Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1902No. L. A. No. 1256Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, Santa Barbara County; W. S. Day, Judge. Action by Edward Hildreth against the Montecito Creek Water Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment adjudging plaintiff entitled to have his premises in the Montecito, in the county of Santa Barbara, known as the “Lorenzana Place,” supplied with water from the pipes and waterworks of defendant corporation, as. the same were being supplied at the time of the commencement of the suit, at the rate of one dollar per month, or such other reasonable rate as may hereafter be lawfully fixed for such water supply, and that defendant, its officers, etc., provided the rates be paid, be perpetually enjoined from shutting off from said premises the water supply…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pocantico Water Works Co. v. BirdNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Shorb v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Crow v. San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McCrary v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API