Legal Opinion

Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Blankfein

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard J. Fried, J.

By motion sequence No. 002, plaintiffs seek an order dismissing this consolidated action as moot, and an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses, pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 626 (e). By motion sequence No. 003, individual plaintiff Ken Brown seeks payment of an incentive fee award of $25,000, in the event motion sequence No. 002 is granted. Defendants do not dispute that the consolidated action ought to be dismissed, but they strenuously oppose the award of attorneys’ fees, arguing that *458the complaints comprising these shareholder derivative…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002
  5. Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ciena Capital Funding, LLC v. Krieg's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Korsinsky v. WinkelreidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API