Legal Opinion

Pohlman v. Dawson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1901No. 12,564PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Russell district court; Lee Monkoe, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

This was an action brought by plaintiffs below to enjoin the plaintiff in error from working at the barber trade in the town of Russell, in violation of the terms of a contract made by him with the plaintiffs. It is alleged in the amended petition that the parties entered into a written contract, a copy of which is set out, in which plaintiff in error, for adequate consideration, agreed as follows :

‘•I, H. C. Pohlman, do hereby sell and assign all my right, title and interest to the building now used by me as a barber shop, together with…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Turner v. AbbottTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Langberg v. WagnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. Okerberg v. CrableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Fox v. BarbeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API