Legal Opinion

Burkitt v. Broyles

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 18, 1958No. 13262PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERLEIN, Justice.

This suit was filed by appellee, Gordon Broyles, against appellant, George W. Bur-kitt, III, to partition the surface only of certain lots in the Burkitt, Bordeaux and Wright Addition to the City of Palestine, in Anderson County, Texas. The appellant answered by general denial. Thereafter appellant filed a plea in abatement setting out that the deed records of Anderson County reflected that appellee had an undivided mineral interest in said property in addition to his interest in the surface, and that he had executed to Lion Oil Company an oil, gas and mineral lease covering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. HinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DavisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Maxwell's Unknown Heirs v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Harris v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burkitt v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Teichberg v. D. H. Blair & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. J. Weingarten, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Burkitt v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Larry Long and Woodbine Production Corporation v. Miken Oil, Inc. and Mike Tate, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API