Burkitt v. Broyles
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WERLEIN, Justice.
This suit was filed by appellee, Gordon Broyles, against appellant, George W. Bur-kitt, III, to partition the surface only of certain lots in the Burkitt, Bordeaux and Wright Addition to the City of Palestine, in Anderson County, Texas. The appellant answered by general denial. Thereafter appellant filed a plea in abatement setting out that the deed records of Anderson County reflected that appellee had an undivided mineral interest in said property in addition to his interest in the surface, and that he had executed to Lion Oil Company an oil, gas and mineral lease covering…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ward v. HinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DavisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Maxwell's Unknown Heirs v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Harris v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burkitt v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Teichberg v. D. H. Blair & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- J. Weingarten, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Burkitt v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Larry Long and Woodbine Production Corporation v. Miken Oil, Inc. and Mike Tate, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015