Teichberg v. D. H. Blair & Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
(I)
The plaintiff is an account executive with a brokerage house,, and is engaged in the business of buying and selling stocks and bonds. The defendant, a limited partnership, is another brokerage house with whom the plaintiff has had much business, both on his own account and' on that of his clients — indeed, the parties continue to do business with each other despite the pendency of this lawsuit. Both parties are without question knowledgeable and sophisticated aJbout matters concerning the handling of securities.
The plaintiff seeks redress for damages claimed to have been suffered by him…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Galbraith v. BuschNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Marks v. Nambil Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Engel v. LichtermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Myers Ex Rel. White v. KapnisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. RakityNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- De Feo v. MerchantMount Vernon City Court · 1982
- Pompeii Estates, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.