Legal Opinion

Diaz v. United States

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided September 1, 2000No. NMCM 200000903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEO, Senior Judge:

The petitioner has submitted a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. He alleges that the military judge improperly denied his motion to dismiss the charges against him and his demand for a further investigation of these charges in accordance with Article 32(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 832(c). He requests an order from this court dismissing all charges and specifications or, in the alternative, an order to the respondent compelling a new or further investigation pursuant to Article 32, UCMJ. We find that the petitioner…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. SamuelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. VoganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  5. United States v. TownesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DiazNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  2. Barna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API