Diaz v. United States
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LEO, Senior Judge:
The petitioner has submitted a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. He alleges that the military judge improperly denied his motion to dismiss the charges against him and his demand for a further investigation of these charges in accordance with Article 32(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 832(c). He requests an order from this court dismissing all charges and specifications or, in the alternative, an order to the respondent compelling a new or further investigation pursuant to Article 32, UCMJ. We find that the petitioner…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. SamuelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. VoganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. TownesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DiazNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- Barna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016