State v. DeRosier
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
After a jury trial, David DeRosier was found guilty of violating A.R.S. § 36-1002, possession of a narcotic drug. He was sentenced to four years probation.
In a memorandum decision the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. After rehearing was denied, both parties filed timely petitions for review which we granted. We take jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and 17 A.R.S. Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 31.19. Decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Two issues are presented by this case. First, did the trial court err in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MyersArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. RamosArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. NixonArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SuskoArizona Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CheramieArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. CheeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.