Huey v. State

MORROW, Judge.

The appeal is from conviction for manslaughter, with punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years. The facts are sufficiently stated in report on former appeal, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 554.

The first bill of exceptions, complaining of proof that appellant was angry, discloses no error. It was competent to prove that he appeared angry. Bennett v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 648; Powers v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 42; Rose’s Notes on Texas Reports, Vol. 5, p. 601. There is nothing in the bill to indicate that the testimony was irrelevant. In support of the…