In re Estate of Radovich
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco settling the accounts of an executor, and from an order modifying such order. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
In 1870, S. Martinovich was duly appointed executor of the last will and testament of L. Eadovich, deceased, and he continued to act as such executor until August, 1882. Among the assets of the estate which came into his possession as executor was a certificate for five shares of the capital stock of the San Francisco and Oakland Eailroad Company. This stock was mentioned in the inventory, and was appraised at $250. Martinovich resigned his place as executor in 1882, and J. L. Eadovich Was appointed administrator of the estate with the will annexed.
Martinovich never obtained any…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- In Re Jennings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Hudson v. BarrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Flynn v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Film Technicians of the Motion Picture Industry, Local 683 v. Color Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.