Legal Opinion
People v. Summitt
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 20, 2006No. 04SC396PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
132 P.3d 320 (2006)
The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner,
v.
Matthew SUMMITT, Respondent.
No. 04SC396.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
March 20, 2006.
Rehearing Denied April 10, 2006.[*]
John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Matthew S. Holman, First Assistant Attorney General, Denver, for Petitioner.
David S. Kaplan, Colorado State Public Defender, Alan Kratz, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for Respondent.
HOBBS, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' judgment in People v. Summitt, 104 P.3d 232 (Colo.App.2004), to determine whether it properly set aside…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Coats; Concurrence · Coats.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moonrise Partners, LLC v. Town of West YellowstoneDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021