Legal Opinion

Preusser v. Sealey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1955No. 5018PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

This proceeding is a writ of error to review a default judgment against appellants for damages for injury to a concrete driveway owned by appellee.

■ Appellants have filed one point of error, assigning as error that the return of service on the citation to them does not show service of the petition upon them. The following elements of the citation are material: it is directed to “William Joseph Preusser and S. Z. Scott, individually and as partners;” it refers to the filing of the “Plaintiff’s original petition;” and it states that “The nature of the demands of plaintiff is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Lauderdale v. R. & T. A. Ennis Stationery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Tullis v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Woodall v. LansfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Brown v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Owen v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Pugh v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API