Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. Haverstraw Road Lands, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Based upon the facts of this case, we conclude that the Supreme Court acted properly in granting the plaintiff purchasers specific performance of the parties’ contract of sale which the defendant seller purportedly canceled due to the failure to timely obtain the requisite subdivision approval under the terms of the contract. The defendant seller’s conduct during the extensive period of delay in the subdivision *676approval process evinced a waiver of the defendant seller’s contractual right to cancel the contract (see, Gresser v Princi, 128 AD2d 752, lv dismissed 70 NY2d 693; cf., Bonavita &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S.E.S. Importers, Inc. v. PappalardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gresser v. PrinciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Louis Bonavita & Sons, Inc. v. QuarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Shepard v. Spring Hollow at SagaponackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Naso v. HaqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Moray v. DBAG, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kistela v. AhlersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Ehrenpreis v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Miranda v. Jay Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.