Legal Opinion

Benham v. Pryke

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1981No. 80CA0926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

Plaintiff, the receiver of Manufacturers and Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange (M&W), appeals a dismissal for failure to state a claim for relief granted in favor of defendants underwriters of Lloyd’s of London (the reinsurers). This is an action to recover proceeds allegedly due under assessment liability reinsurance policies issued by the reinsurers to some former subscribers of M&W. We reverse.

M&W was an interinsurance exchange governed by § 10-13-101, et seq., C.R.S. 1973. M&W subscribers, consequently, were subject to contingent assessment liability if M&W’s liabilities in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. ClausenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Foster Lumber Co., Inc. v. Weston Constructors, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. JAMES J. BROGGER, ETC. v. American Motorists Ins.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. In Re International Re-Insurance CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. First Nat. Bank of Fleming v. Maryland Cas. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benham v. PrykeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Benham v. PrykeColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API