Benham v. Pryke
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Plaintiff, the receiver of Manufacturers and Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange (M & W), appeals the summary judgment in favor of defendants, underwriters of Lloyd’s of London (the reinsurers). This is an action to recover proceeds claimed to be due under assessment liability reinsurance policies issued by the reinsurers to some subscribers of M & W. We reverse.
M & W was an interinsurance exchange governed by § 10-13-101, et seq., C.R.S. Consequently, M & W subscribers were subject to contingent assessment liability if M & W’s liabilities in a given year exceeded its assets. Some…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- US Fidelity & Guaranty v. YOUNG LIFE CAMPAIGNColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of Estate of AbbottColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Michael v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HuehnColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Benham v. PrykeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987