Legal Opinion
Morgan v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 23, 2009No. B206788PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WILLHITE, Acting P. J.
This appeal involves a consumer class action alleged against defendant AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (AT&T), 1 based upon AT&T’s marketing and sale of premium cell phones that operated on a wireless network that AT&T allegedly modified in a manner that rendered those premium cell phones essentially useless. What started as a 13-page original complaint alleging causes of action under the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), the false advertising law (FAL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17500 et seq.), the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Stearns v. Ticketmaster Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Collins v. eMachines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- John Doe v. Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.