Legal Opinion

Vivas v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 23, 2014No. Case No. 10-22992-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOSE E. MARTINEZ, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. No. 85) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. No. 77). Plaintiff Ramses Vivas (‘Vivas” or “Plaintiff”) participated in an employee benefit plan funded by a group insurance policy (the “Policy”) that Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford” or “Defendant”) issued to his employer, Kendall Imports. (D.E. No. 77 at ¶ 1; D.E. No. 84 at ¶ 1).…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ness v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
  2. Johnston v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API