Legal Opinion
TUCSON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED v. Schwartz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 18, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1238PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
A unique set of facts requires this court to determine the adequacy of a warning placed on a can of contact cement.
• Plaintiffs-appellees, Helen Schwartz and her husband, Jack Schwartz, brought an action against the defendants-appellants for injuries suffered by Mrs. Schwartz to her eyes allegedly as a result of coming into contact with fumes from a product known as Wilhold Contax Cement. The matter was tried to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of Mrs. Schwartz in the sum of $75,000.00 and against all the defendants. There have been two separate appeals by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Martin v. Bengue, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- La Plant v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tucson Industries, Incorporated v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Walsh v. LG Chem AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021