Legal Opinion
Cummins, Inc. v. Tas Distributing Company, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided November 30, 2009No. Case 09-cv-1096PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & OPINION
JOE BILLY McDADE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on TAS’ 1 Motion for Summary Judgment under the Doctrine of Res Judicata (Doc. 18). Cummins has responded in opposition to this Motion (Doc. 20), and TAS has replied to this Response (Doc. 22). Cummins has also filed a Motion for Leave to File a Surreply to Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 23), which TAS has opposed (Doc. 24). In addition, TAS has filed a Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of the instant Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 26). For the reasons stated below, TAS’ Motion for Summary Judgment is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Cummins, Inc. v. Tas Distributing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- State ex rel. Darwin v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Brantley v. Red River Waste Solutions LPDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.