Legal Opinion

INA Life Insurance v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 1977No. Appeal, No. 204 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

INA Life Insurance Company (INA) submitted for approval to the Insurance Department (Department) three policy forms offering double indemnity accidental death benefits that it planned to offer as riders to its standard life insurance policies.1 Included *418in the proposed riders was the following limitation or condition:

INDEMNITY. If the Insured sustains an accidental bodily injury while insured under this policy which results, directly and independently of all other causes and within 365 days of the accident causing such injury, in the Insured’s death, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Burne v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Norristown Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Pennsylyania Life Insurance v. Pennsylvania National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Townsend TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Financial Security Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. National Life & Accident Insurance v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Strickland v. Gulf Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Hawes v. Kansas Farm BureauSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Life Insurance Co. of North America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API