Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 5, 1992No. Record 910687Published

1DissentJustice Lacy, joined by Chief Justice Carrico and Justice Compton

The trial court dismissed Michael Mizenko’s motion for judgment against Electric Motor and Contracting Company, Inc. and Metro Machine Corporation based on its interpretation and application of two cases recently decided by this Court: McBride v. Metric Constructors, 239 Va. 138, 387 S.E.2d 780 (1990), and American Foods v. Ford, 221 Va. 557, 272 S.E.2d 187 (1980). Like the trial court, I *165find no factual or legal circumstances of jurisprudential significance which take the instant case out of the purview of McBride and Ford. The majority’s attempt to draw such distinctions is unpersuasive and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API