Legal Opinion

Austin v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior ■court. July term, 1890.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

Where the owner of personal property, by a parol contract of sale, sold the same to another against whom there was a judgment, although it may have been the intention of the parties at the time of the sale that the seller should reserve the title until the property was paid for, and that the purchaser should give a promissory note accordingly, yet where no such note was in fact given, but after an execution based on the judgment mentioned had been levied upon the property the seller accepted and sold a mortgage thereon which had been previously executed by the purchaser, in which it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mann v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Penland v. CatheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Little v. WidenerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Flemming v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API