Legal Opinion

Ahia v. Department of Transportation

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1988No. 12137PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*539OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, “native Hawaiians” who are “qualified applicants for Hawaiian Home Land leases, including leaseholds in the Kamaoa-Puueo area of Ka‘u, Hawaii[,]” sought a declaration that “General Lease No. 213 [issued by the Hawaiian Homes Commission (HHC or the Commission) to the Department of Transportation (DOT) is] null and void.” Defendants-appellees,1 claiming an absence of genuine issues of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, moved for summary judgment. After hearing argument and reviewing the pleadings, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rayor v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Territory v. ToyotaHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Oahu Railway Co. v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aged Hawaiians v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ahia v. Department of TransportationHawaii Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API