Legal Opinion

Paul H. Smith v. Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin Denney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2009No. 07-0697Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

════════════

No. 07-0697

════════════

Paul H. Smith, et al., Petitioners,

v.

Thomas O’Donnell, Executor of the Estate of Corwin Denney, Respondent

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

On Petition for Review from the

Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Argued September 10, 2008

Justice Willett, joined by Justice Wainwright, dissenting.

This legal-malpractice appeal turns on whether Belt[1] or Barcelo[2] should control. Decided a decade apart, both decisions have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barcelo v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Guest v. Cochran, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. Cailloux, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  5. Stoll v. Henderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API