Legal Opinion

Strong v. MacK

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1944No. Civ. 3088PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action to quiet title to two lots in the city of San Diego. The plaintiff claims under a tax deed dated July 9, 1940, which was issued after a sale pursuant to the provisions of section 3897 of the Political Code. The property had been sold to the state because of the nonpayment of the second installment of taxes for the year 1933-1934. The defendant Novotny, the former owner of the property, attacked these sales on the ground that the levy or assessment upon which they were based was void.

At the trial the plaintiff introduced his tax deed and rested. Thé defendant Novotny…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bila v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rittersbacher v. Bd. of Supervisors of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. ArguelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Compton v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Wall v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Griffith Co. v. BelchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API